Menu Content/Inhalt
Home arrow Research arrow Browse findings
Browse findings
7.1.2 Proprietary intellectual property

To the extent that an entity in the Social Economy is operating for altruistic reasons , it is hard to find a justification for keeping intellectual property secret.  If the intellectual property could advance society in some other party’s hands then it should be shared.

Read more...
 
7.1.3 Heterogeneity
When we consider many of the concepts raised, and competition in particular, we must respect the enormous diversity within the sector.  Not only does the content, or purpose, of organisations vary widely but so does industry structure and dynamics. 
Read more...
 
7.2. How should we understand competition in the Social Economy?
We are confronted with a multitude of views about the nature, dysfunctions, and largely unwanted effects and consequences of competition in the sector. But how are these views to be “explained”? What is missing in the sector? Is there a pattern of reasons that provides the best explanation for the virulence and intensity of competition in a sector that espouses high moral values?  Should this kind of competition be occurring in a context where organisations and programs are mission/values -driven. There are several ways of “explaining” competition and its consequences.
 
7.2.1 Cooperate, cooperate, and cooperate
Competition was not a Key Issue we used in the original “design” of the study. We did ask a question about collaboration and cooperation across sectors and were consistently met with laments about the dysfunctions and challenges of competition in the sector.
Read more...
 
7.2.2 Reactive culture
We have already observed a culture of reaction and/or acceptance (which we also described as a form of reactivity leading to “powerlessness”) in the Social Economy (See Chapter 3). As a consequence, members of the sector tend to take a conservative role and stance on the major issues, challenges, and conditions which influence and/or are imposed on their work. Hence, a number of respondents descried the imposition of Government’s anti-democratic embargo on contact with the media as a condition of funding for specific delivery service projects.
Read more...
 
7: Competition in the Sector

The issue of competition was not prompted or raised by the research team but by survey participants themselves. Interestingly, the issue “Competition” was most frequently raised in responses related to “Collaboration and Cooperation”.

Read more...
 
10 Ambiguous language and miscommunication
With the ongoing analysis of data being generated by the project some quite unexpected outcomes were found.  Upon further investigation, the issues became more, not less clear.  As more and more commentary was analysed the problem was revealed – the participants’ communication was in fact very ambiguous.  The words being used (for example, funding, competition, cooperation, business, etc) carried multiple meanings and could be easily misunderstood.  
Read more...
 
11.1. Motivations and misalignments
An item that “rose” to the surface a number of times was that of “motivation” .  The concept of motivation (or intention as a basis for action) was often discussed in a context of self-interest (acting solely in one’s own interests to the detriment of another) and altruism (acting solely with regard for the other) .
Read more...
 
11.3 The righteous Social Economy
Many participants described how they felt like “poor cousins” compared with their corporate peers.   This situation, it was claimed many times,  is partly the consequence of having to “beg” for funding and partly a consequence of not having sufficient resources to conduct their “business” in as professional a manner as they might like. Instead they had to rely on “hand outs” in the form of voluntary and pro-bono support.
Read more...
 
11: Uneven Preoccupations: Motivations and Misalignments

In this chapter, we want to draw attention to two principal issues that arose in the study and which we have described as “uneven preoccupations”. The first focuses on the idea of misalignment of interests where interests may be motivated by a sense of self, egoism, and/or described as vested self interests. The second issue we have called the righteous Social Economy. This issue is closely related to the first because it seemed that the expression of righteousness (being upright but also including self-righteousness) we observed among many members in the sector, was also motivated by forms of self interest.


Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>

Results 21 - 30 of 30