Menu Content/Inhalt
Home arrow Dialogue
SEEEN dialogue
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Research project discussions (1 viewing) (1) Guests
Post a new message in "Research project discussions"
Name:
Email*:
Subject:
topic icon:
no
Boardcode:
 Colour:  Size:   Close all tags
Message:

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   
* - your email address will never be displayed on the site.

Topic History of: Second focus group -Advocacy and funding politics
Max. showing the last posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
April I am in agreement with you on this one.



B&B in Stratford-Upon-Avon
Leo Bartlett The majority of participants expressed their concerns about the role of advocacy in dealing with funders and governments. They identified a "politics of retribution" (for example, the requirement of complying with non-contact with the media about issues affecting the industry or funded program) as an inhibiting factor on both the behaviour of non-profit organizations and the effective development of the non-profit sector.



Where the funder was the Government, grant recipients could then be characterized, in some cases, as "the invisible eyes and ears of the Government". Such a position created a tension for organisations in that it tended to limit them in formulating policy changes envisaged by the SE sector, and transparent participation in the policies implemented by Government. In some cases it was suggested that failure to comply with funder requirements could have more severe consequences such as the erasure of Tax Concession Charity and Deductible Gift Recipient status.
Powered by FireBoardget the latest posts directly to your desktop